Maybe road rage isn't anti social
a
Date: 2002-06-30
The problem with road rage appears to lie in the definition, writes David Dehaas. In a recent article in Canada's National Post newspaper, Dehaas points out that the term is often applied to driving behavior which is aggressive rather than enraged. "Organizations and even government departments that are otherwise fairly respectable have fallen into the trap of wildly exaggerating hazards, alleging cases of road rage that are really nothing more than momentary impatience." They're describing as "anti social" some pretty common behaviors that most people are guilty of.
Researchers are citing aggressive driving as road rage, says Dehaas, but the
most commonly cited aggressive driving behavior is "speeding," according to
one Canadian study, and about 85% of drivers admit they do that. It can hardly
be described as antisocial, Dehaas argues. "Furthermore, closer scrutiny of
the speed of traffic would reveal that the flashing of lights, honking of horns
and wanton display of various suggestive hand signals tends to be directed
not at drivers exceeding the speed limit but at those anti-social people in
the other 15% -- the ones puttering along at 99 kilometres an hour in the fast
lane." Read
the DeHaas article ![]()
Login or sign up to receive email notification
when a comment is added to this thread.
NOTE - You can cancel at any time, and we have a strict privacy policy which forbids us from sharing your email address or other information with any third party.




